Category: PPLI by Country

The most valuable planning window in Israel is the one before your client becomes a resident. Once they land, the best move is already behind them. Most planning for Aliyah begins after arrival. The family lands, settles, opens Israeli accounts, and — some months later — sits down with an adviser to think about the portfolio. By then, the single most powerful structuring opportunity has already closed. For an internationally mobile family moving to Israel, the decisive action is taken before Israeli tax residency attaches, not after. What Israel Taxes Before You Arrive — Almost Nothing Before Aliyah, your client is a non-resident of Israel. Israel taxes non-residents only on Israeli-source income and Israeli capital gains — principally Israeli real

Section 14 gives new immigrants a decade of zero tax on foreign income and gains — so most Olim do nothing with their portfolio. That is precisely the mistake. There is a comfortable logic that settles over many new immigrants to Israel in their first year. Under Section 14 of the Income Tax Ordinance, a new immigrant (Oleh Chadash) or veteran returning resident pays no Israeli tax on foreign-source income or foreign capital gains for ten full years. No dividends tax. No interest tax. No capital gains tax on the offshore portfolio. And Israel has no estate, inheritance, or gift tax at all. On the surface, there is nothing to plan for — the portfolio is already tax-free. The logic

Ireland is the last major Western European remittance-basis regime standing. For a non-resident with Irish assets, or a family planning a move, the decisive planning happens before residency attaches. Two kinds of client need to think about Irish tax before they think they do. The first holds assets in Ireland — property, a stake in an Irish company — while living elsewhere. The second is planning to move to Ireland, often from the United Kingdom, where the non-dom regime was abolished in April 2025. For both, the most valuable planning is done before Irish residency and before a succession event, not after. What Ireland Taxes When You Are Not Resident A non-resident is exposed to Irish tax on a defined,

In most jurisdictions a life wrapper is a deferral tool. In Ireland it is taxed on the way out — and at 60% if you pick the assets. The real Irish story is somewhere else entirely. If you have read our guides to Italy, Cyprus, or Israel, you will recognise a familiar shape: a window of low or zero tax on foreign income, and a Private Placement Life Insurance policy that carries the efficiency beyond the window. It is tempting to assume Ireland works the same way. It does not, and an adviser who imports that logic into an Irish plan will get it wrong. Ireland taxes the growth inside a life wrapper deliberately. A foreign life policy held by

For a non-resident, Belgium reaches Belgian real estate — on its income and on death — but leaves a financial portfolio largely alone. That asymmetry is the whole plan. A great many families have a Belgian footprint without being Belgian residents: an apartment in Brussels, a house in the Ardennes, a legacy holding from a period spent working in the country, or a plan to move there for a role that has not yet started. For all of them, the first question is not how Belgium taxes residents — it is what Belgium taxes when you are not one. The answer is narrower than most people fear, and it points straight at how the assets should be held. What Belgium

For decades a Belgian private investor paid no tax on capital gains. In 2026 that changed — and a well-worn insurance structure suddenly looks a great deal more useful. Belgium has always been a high-tax country with one conspicuous exception. Income was taxed hard — a flat 30% withholding on every dividend and every euro of interest — but the growth in the value of a share portfolio, for a private investor managing personal wealth in the normal way, was not taxed at all. That single exception shaped how a generation of Belgian families invested. In 2026, it ended. Three federal measures arrived together, and their combined effect is the most significant change to the taxation of private wealth in